Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Introduced September 2016
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.4" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 320 x 240 video
- 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
- 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
- Introduced January 2009
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and S930 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and S930 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M1 II was introduced 7 years later than the S930 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S930 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II grades vs the S930 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery and Sony S930 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony S930
E-M1 II | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2016 | January 2009 | More recent by 94 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.4" | Larger display (+0.6") | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 112k | Sharper display (+925k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Olympus E-M1 II
S930 | E-M1 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930
E-M1 II | S930 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony S930 has specifications of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the S930.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and S930 is 68 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and S930.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2016-09-19 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 38-108mm (2.8x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.4 inch |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dots | 112 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.00 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 320x240 |
Video data format | MOV, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 574 grams (1.27 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 80 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.7 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.8 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1312 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | 2 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Price at launch | $1,700 | $219 |