Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930

Portability
68
Imaging
59
Features
93
Overall
72
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Introduced September 2016
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony S930
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.4" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 320 x 240 video
  • 38-108mm (F2.9-5.4) lens
  • 167g - 90 x 61 x 26mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Overview

In this write-up, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and S930 (10MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and S930 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 II was introduced 7 years later than the S930 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony S930 being a Compact camera.

Before we go through a complete comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M1 II grades vs the S930 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony S930

 E-M1 II S930 
IntroducedSeptember 2016January 2009More recent by 94 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display sizing3"2.4"Larger display (+0.6")
Display resolution1037k112kSharper display (+925k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony S930 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 S930 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930

 E-M1 II S930 
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 II comes with external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) and the Sony S930 has specifications of 90mm x 61mm x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 II vs the S930.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and S930 is 68 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 II and S930.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II having a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer extra detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II provides an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Portrait photography with Sony S930
75
you can focus manually
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
supports RAW files
26
manual focus
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Street photography factors
Sony S930 Street photography factors
78
screen can move to multiple angles
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment proof
lighter than competition in class (574g)
above average high ISO (25,600)
56
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Sports photography factors
Sony S930 Sports photography factors
74
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
24
built in image stabilization (Optical)
low frames per second (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Travel photography details
Sony S930 Travel photography details
72
lighter than competition in class (574 grams)
environment proof
comes with focus by touch
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
screen is selfie friendly
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
50
has built in flash
no Time Lapse function
MP count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony S930 Landscape photography details
76
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good megapixels (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
two card slots
not so great battery pack (350 CIPA)
31
manual focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
tiny screen (2.4 inch)
manual mode not possible
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
no Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging highlights
Sony S930 Vlogging highlights
79
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
great video quality (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone socket
lighter than competition in class (574g)
25
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.9)
display is not selfie friendly
video res low (320 x 240 resolution)
no external mic socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony S930 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony S930
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S930
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2016-09-19 2009-01-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 38-108mm (2.8x)
Max aperture - f/2.9-5.4
Macro focusing range - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inch 2.4 inch
Display resolution 1,037 thousand dots 112 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 1/8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000s 1/2000s
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, Forced Flash, Slow Syncro, No Flash
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 320x240
Video data format MOV, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) none
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 574 grams (1.27 lbs) 167 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 90 x 61 x 26mm (3.5" x 2.4" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLH-1 2 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / PRo-HG Duo, Internal
Card slots Two 1
Price at launch $1,700 $219