Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9
68 Imaging
59 Features
93 Overall
72
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1
- Replacement is Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Launched July 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Overview
On this page, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 II (20MP) and TX9 (12MP) and the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and TX9 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M1 II was manufactured 6 years later than the TX9 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the E-M1 II grades versus the TX9 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 II Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony TX9
| E-M1 II | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2016 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 76 months |
| Display type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
| Display resolution | 1037k |  | 922k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus E-M1 II
| TX9 | E-M1 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony TX9
| E-M1 II | TX9 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II has got exterior dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has sizing of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 II versus the TX9.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 II and TX9 is 68 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its hard to see the gap in sensor measurements only by looking through specifications. The visual here should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and TX9.
Plainly, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 II featuring a larger sensor will make achieving bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will render extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II will have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony TX9 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
| Class | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2016-09-19 | 2010-07-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VIII | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 200 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Min boosted ISO | 64 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 2 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Highest quiet shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) | 3.80 m |
| Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MOV, H.264 | AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 574g (1.27 lb) | 149g (0.33 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 80 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.7 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.8 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 1312 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BN1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | Dual | One |
| Price at launch | $1,700 | $799 |