Clicky

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220

Portability
68
Imaging
60
Features
93
Overall
73
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 front
Portability
96
Imaging
43
Features
41
Overall
42

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
  • Revealed September 2016
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M1 III
Sony WX220
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
  • 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
  • Announced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 II (20MP) and the WX220 (18MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M1 II (Four Thirds) and WX220 (1/2.3") offer different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The E-M1 II was introduced 2 years later than the WX220 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 II grades versus the WX220 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Sony WX220

 E-M1 II WX220 
AnnouncedSeptember 2016February 2014Fresher by 32 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k460kSharper display (+577k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus E-M1 II

 WX220 E-M1 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX220

 E-M1 II WX220 
Display size3"3"Same display measurement

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 II enjoys physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") and a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has sizing of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 II against the WX220.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 II and WX220 is 68 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by looking at specifications. The visual underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 II and WX220.

To sum up, the 2 cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 II using its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF easier and the Olympus E-M1 II will give you extra detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 II should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Portrait photography advice
Sony WX220 Portrait photography advice
76
focusing manually
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
37
resolution is good (18MP)
comes with face detection focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
no external flash support
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Street photography with Sony WX220
78
screen articulates
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
provides touch focus
weather proof
lighter than competitors (574g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
59
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M1 II
Sports photography with Sony WX220
75
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast continuous shooting (60.0 fps)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
weather proof
comes with phase detect autofocus
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
46
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony WX220 as a Travel photography camera
72
lighter than competitors (574 grams)
weather proof
provides touch focus
decent megapixels (20MP)
selfie friendly screen
bad battery pack (350 shots)
69
resolution is good (18MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (25mm)
long zoom (250mm)
no Time Lapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Landscape photography details
Sony WX220 Landscape photography details
76
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent megapixels (20 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
doesnt have low pass filter
very good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
weather proof
has double storage slots
bad battery pack (350 per charge)
44
decently wide (25mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (18 megapixels)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
no manual mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 II Vlogging details
Sony WX220 Vlogging details
79
selfie friendly screen
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection autofocus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pxls)
does have external microphone port
lighter than competitors (574g)
34
decently wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
does not have selfie friendly display
no external mic jack
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M1 II vs Sony WX220 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 II and Sony WX220
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IISony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220
Class Pro Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2016-09-19 2014-02-12
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 18 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4896 x 3672
Max native ISO 25600 12800
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-250mm (10.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.3-5.9
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,037k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000s 1/1600s
Fastest quiet shutter speed 1/32000s -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 9.10 m (at ISO 100) 3.70 m (with Auto ISO)
Flash settings Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MOV, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 574 grams (1.27 pounds) 121 grams (0.27 pounds)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 80 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.7 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.8 not tested
DXO Low light score 1312 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 images 210 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 NP-BN
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots 2 Single
Pricing at release $1,700 $198