Clicky

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II

Portability
69
Imaging
44
Features
42
Overall
43
Olympus E-510 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs

Olympus E-510
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 490g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Revealed November 2007
  • Also referred to as EVOLT E-510
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-500
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-520
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Announced August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview

On this page, we are reviewing the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both are produced by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-510 (10MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-510 was announced 8 years prior to the E-M10 II and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-510 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the E-510 scores versus the E-M10 II in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-510 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 E-510 E-M10 II 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-510

 E-M10 II E-510 
AnnouncedAugust 2015November 2007Fresher by 94 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus E-510 and Olympus E-M10 II

 E-510 E-M10 II 
Focus manually Very precise focus
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-510 provides exterior measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 490 grams (1.08 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the E-510 versus the E-M10 II.

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-510 and E-M10 II is 69 and 82 respectively.

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-510 and E-M10 II.

Clearly, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Olympus E-M10 II to give extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older E-510 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-510 Portrait photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
56
you can focus manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
low MP (10 megapixels)
72
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-510
Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
68
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
lighter than competition (490 grams)
no articulating screen
83
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-510 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
52
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.0 frames per second)
low MP (10MP)
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-510 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography factors
52
lighter than competition (490g)
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse function
low MP (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
73
has touch focus
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-510 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography highlights
55
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inches)
low MP (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse function
79
manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-510 Vlogging advice
Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging advice
9
no video shooting
35
built-in touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-510 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-510 and Olympus E-M10 II
 Olympus E-510Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus E-510 Olympus OM-D E-M10 II
Also referred to as EVOLT E-510 -
Category Advanced DSLR Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2007-11-23 2015-08-25
Body design Mid-size SLR SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 16MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 3648 x 2736 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 200
RAW images
Minimum enhanced ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 3 81
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 45 107
Crop factor 2.1 2.1
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 1,040 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 95% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.46x 0.62x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 3.0fps 8.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 12.00 m (at ISO 100) 5.80 m (ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/180 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions - 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 1920x1080
Video data format - H.264, Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 490 grams (1.08 lbs) 390 grams (0.86 lbs)
Physical dimensions 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 52 73
DXO Color Depth score 21.2 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score 10.0 12.5
DXO Low light score 442 842
Other
Battery life - 320 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery model - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Storage media Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Price at release $550 $499