Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Revealed February 2020
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released January 2011
  • Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FX77
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Overview

Following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") have different sensor measurements.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 III was manufactured 9 years after the FX78 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M1 III scores versus the FX78 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FX78

 E-M1 III FX78 
ReleasedFebruary 2020January 2011More modern by 111 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Display resolution1037k230kCrisper display (+807k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 FX78 E-M1 III 
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FX78

 E-M1 III FX78 
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison

If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys exterior measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FX78 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M1 III and the FX78.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and FX78 is 67 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at specifications. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M1 III and FX78.

To sum up, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 III because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you greater detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III provides a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography advice
Panasonic FX78 Portrait photography advice
77
focusing manually
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
21
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Street photography with Panasonic FX78
78
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
offers focus by touch
weather proofing
great ISO range (25,600)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Sports photography camera
81
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000s)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
weather proofing
sensor has phase detect autofocus
28
has image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking autofocus
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,400s)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery (200 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography info
Panasonic FX78 Travel photography info
79
weather proofing
connects via bluetooth
offers focus by touch
good resolution (20 megapixels)
selfie friendly display
56
flash built-in
quite wide (24mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
bad battery (200 CIPA)
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Panasonic FX78
81
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
does not have anti-alias filter
great ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
weather proofing
2 card slots
36
quite wide (24mm)
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
manual exposure not possible
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
bad battery (200 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging details
Panasonic FX78 Vlogging details
79
selfie friendly display
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
includes external microphone support
33
quite wide (24mm)
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow max aperture (f2.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FX78
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
General Information
Brand Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Also referred to as - Lumix DMC-FX77
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2020-02-11 2011-01-25
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic IX Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW images
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 11
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.9
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3.5"
Resolution of display 1,037k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1400 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 60.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 5.60 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lbs) 142 grams (0.31 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 420 images 200 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Retail pricing $1,800 $210