Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Released July 2012
  • Replaced the Panasonic FZ100
  • Replacement is Panasonic FZ300
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M1 III was launched 7 years later than the FZ200 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go in to a in-depth comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M1 III grades versus the FZ200 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-M1 III FZ200 
ReleasedFebruary 2020July 2012More recent by 93 months
Display resolution1037k460kCrisper display (+577k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 FZ200 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FZ200

 E-M1 III FZ200 
Manual focus Very exact focusing
Display typeFully ArticulatedFully ArticulatedFully Articulated display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Both are selfie friendly

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III has got external measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ200 has proportions of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") along with a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III versus the FZ200.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and FZ200 is 67 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements only by seeing technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and FZ200.

As you can tell, each of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III because of its larger sensor will make getting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will show extra detail utilizing its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M1 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography factors
77
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW files
48
manual focus
high flash sync (1/4,000s)
supports face detect focusing
delivers RAW files
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography details
78
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
supports touch focus
weather proofing
very good high ISO (25,600)
57
screen can move to multiple angles
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
more heavy than competition in class (588 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography details
Panasonic FZ200 Sports photography details
81
great max shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
max frames per second high (60.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
weather proofing
supports phase detect autofocus
46
great zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery life (540 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography features
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography features
79
weather proofing
has bluetooth
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
selfie friendly display
55
better than average battery life (540 shots)
built-in flash
screen is selfie friendly
rather wide (25mm)
great zoom (600mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (588g)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Panasonic FZ200
81
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is decent (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
doesnt have anti-alias filter
very good high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
has double storage slots
48
manual focus
rather wide (25mm)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
delivers RAW files
better than average battery life (540 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging features
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging features
79
selfie friendly display
touch screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
video res high (4096 x 2160 pxls)
comes with external mic port
63
rather wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does have microphone port
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
more heavy than competition in class (588g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Category Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2020-02-11 2012-07-18
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum enhanced ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 23
Cross focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fully Articulated Fully Articulated
Screen size 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot 1,312 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Fastest silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shutter speed 60.0fps 12.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 13.50 m
Flash modes Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync 1/250 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Max video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 580g (1.28 lb) 588g (1.30 lb)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 37
DXO Color Depth score not tested 19.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 10.8
DXO Low light score not tested 114
Other
Battery life 420 shots 540 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLH-1 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 2 Single
Pricing at release $1,800 $499