Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5708/e57084ceb52f3aee5776564caad37a3d062fbbca" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 front"
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Old Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Older Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Later Model is Panasonic ZS30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and ZS25 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and ZS25 (1/2.3") have different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 III was unveiled 7 years later than the ZS25 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS25 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the E-M1 III scores versus the ZS25 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Panasonic ZS25
E-M1 III | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 87 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+577k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus E-M1 III
ZS25 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Panasonic ZS25
E-M1 III | ZS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III comes with physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 III vs the ZS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22946/229468c6125d2201f92afb08194058c3e3753800" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and ZS25 is 67 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e3887/e3887d291e5a1d8dabbef1ff7cd6e6396e6d5609" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor sizing just by checking specs. The photograph underneath might give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and ZS25.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III with its bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M1 III will give you greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/699f3/699f300a804a86b2e92ccad01ff955d5874dc8e2" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d032/9d0327c6900f9d5f8d2a23f5687f89c8b465f972" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 23 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/1200 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lb) | 193g (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 images | 260 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLH-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Two | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $1,800 | $300 |