Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e60cc/e60cc16c5da56b395f923e1642038b1853d99b0c" alt="Pentax K-01 front Pentax K-01 front"
76 Imaging
57 Features
68 Overall
61
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 561g - 122 x 79 x 58mm
- Revealed May 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and K-01 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and K-01 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The E-M1 III was released 7 years after the K-01 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M1 III matches up vs the K-01 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III and Pentax K-01. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery and Pentax K-01 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Pentax K-01
E-M1 III | K-01 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2012 | Newer by 94 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+116k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-01 over the Olympus E-M1 III
K-01 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Pentax K-01
E-M1 III | K-01 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III features physical measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-01 has dimensions of 122mm x 79mm x 58mm (4.8" x 3.1" x 2.3") accompanied by a weight of 561 grams (1.24 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M1 III vs the K-01.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f7c9/7f7c9c1e8a497102c4301b4b25ecd06890d4f732" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 III and K-01 is 67 and 76 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/38339/383391ac756cf1f8750e9a68357f3cdd74654079" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M1 III and K-01.
All in all, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M1 III provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22ba6/22ba6964ecc38e3a26b315e4b3b940af76e9c6b0" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7b10/e7b10e299a79bfaf73df8ea9f388b4d5483df286" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Pentax K-01 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-01 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Pentax K-01 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2012-05-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 81 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 60.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps),1280 x 720 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 561g (1.24 lbs) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 122 x 79 x 58mm (4.8" x 3.1" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.9 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1135 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photographs | 540 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | D-LI90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Two | One |
Launch cost | $1,800 | $899 |