Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c94ff/c94ffb4ff8eb21d03f8fbb46e1fa35095f788790" alt="Sony Alpha NEX-5N front Sony Alpha NEX-5N front"
89 Imaging
56 Features
69 Overall
61
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Released February 2020
- Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 111 x 59 x 38mm
- Announced October 2011
- Previous Model is Sony NEX-5
- Updated by Sony NEX-5R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Overview
The following is a detailed assessment of the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and NEX-5N (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and NEX-5N (APS-C) posses different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 III was revealed 8 years after the NEX-5N which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony NEX-5N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 III scores versus the NEX-5N when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Alpha NEX-5N. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony NEX-5N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony NEX-5N
E-M1 III | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2020 | ![]() | October 2011 | Newer by 102 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-5N over the Olympus E-M1 III
NEX-5N | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony NEX-5N
E-M1 III | NEX-5N | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 III enjoys outside dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") having a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-5N has dimensions of 111mm x 59mm x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the NEX-5N.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55f02/55f0284cb803a8f08839c07bf0af71a3a15c62c1" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and NEX-5N is 67 and 89 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36d77/36d775009d62e385d05ae080c932180dbd25cbfc" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by looking at specifications. The pic underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and NEX-5N.
To sum up, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M1 III with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-M1 III will give more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b31b/8b31be25891296fe3a44044951be54f02efe2c57" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/edfc2/edfc2d0da93af8a6225e514a994b370121208ea9" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony NEX-5N Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Alpha NEX-5N | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Alpha NEX-5N |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-02-11 | 2011-10-03 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic IX | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4912 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Cross type focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Available lenses | 107 | 121 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | Tilt Up 80°, Down 45° TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 60.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 580g (1.28 lbs) | 269g (0.59 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 111 x 59 x 38mm (4.4" x 2.3" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1079 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 photos | 460 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLH-1 | NPFW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Two | Single |
Price at launch | $1,800 | $550 |