Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20
67 Imaging
62 Features
96 Overall
75
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dfd20/dfd201ee1ec08dd7f35737363e18ef59716b03bf" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbecb/dbecb4b1e7fb5d4bf01f84896f1c6a31656c1510" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 front"
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Announced February 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Released May 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony H20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and H20 (10MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and H20 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 III was revealed 10 years later than the H20 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony H20 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M1 III grades against the H20 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 III Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony H20
E-M1 III | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2020 | ![]() | May 2009 | Fresher by 131 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+807k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus E-M1 III
H20 | E-M1 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony H20
E-M1 III | H20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to carry your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 III has external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) while the Sony H20 has proportions of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") having a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M1 III versus Sony H20 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III versus the H20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0d48/e0d488916e6909836d64d4540633e1b7dc95f164" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and H20 is 67 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f14a/4f14a9bef025384e9516fbc377cd168daad5ce93" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading technical specs. The photograph underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 III and H20.
As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 III will deliver more detail because of its extra 10MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 III is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28d59/28d59f42f977993d7c016c54f2e1980b4d611c6d" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8e75/e8e7582b8d98d847dbe50d8ededc2f5175950f60" alt="Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony H20 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2020-02-11 | 2009-05-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic IX | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 9 |
Cross focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 2cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,037k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 60.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.10 m |
Flash settings | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 580 gr (1.28 lb) | 250 gr (0.55 lb) |
Dimensions | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 420 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLH-1 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Dual | One |
Cost at launch | $1,800 | $249 |