Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II front
Portability
78
Imaging
75
Features
65
Overall
71

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Introduced February 2020
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sony RX1R II
(Full Review)
  • 42MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F2.0) lens
  • 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
  • Released October 2015
  • Superseded the Sony RX1R
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX1R II, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and RX1R II (Full frame) posses different sensor measurements.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M1 III was released 4 years later than the RX1R II and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 III grades vs the RX1R II in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony RX1R II

 E-M1 III RX1R II 
ReleasedFebruary 2020October 2015More recent by 53 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus E-M1 III

 RX1R II E-M1 III 
Display resolution1229k1037kClearer display (+192k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX1R II

 E-M1 III RX1R II 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing
Display size3"3"Same display measurements

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 III has physical dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") along with a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX1R II in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 III against the RX1R II.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 III and RX1R II is 67 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The photograph underneath might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and RX1R II.

As you can see, both cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 III featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF tougher and the Sony RX1R II will produce extra detail as a result of its extra 22MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 III should have an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Portrait photography highlights
Sony RX1R II Portrait photography highlights
77
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
supports RAW files
85
focusing manually
great flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count great (42 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
features face detect focusing
exports RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography advice
Sony RX1R II Street photography advice
78
screen articulates
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with touch to focus
environment proof
good ISO range (25,600)
73
has a tilting screen
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW formats
above average high ISO (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (507g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography advice
Sony RX1R II Sports photography advice
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000 seconds)
quiet shooting (1/32,000 seconds)
fast shooting (60.0 fps)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
comes with phase detect auto focus
62
MP count great (42MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
features tracking focus
sensor has phase detect AF
focal length is fixed (35mm)
slow frames per second (5.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low battery power (220 CIPA)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Travel photography highlights
Sony RX1R II Travel photography highlights
79
environment proof
supports bluetooth
comes with touch to focus
good MP (20MP)
selfie friendly display
59
MP count great (42 megapixels)
fast max aperture (f2.0)
no Timelapse recording
low battery power (220 CIPA)
more heavy than competition (507 grams)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Sony RX1R II
81
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
does not have anti aliasing filter
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
has dual storage slots
68
focusing manually
fast max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
MP count great (42 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
does not have anti-alias filter
above average high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
low battery power (220 shots)
no Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging highlights
Sony RX1R II Vlogging highlights
79
selfie friendly display
touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
high quality video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone jack
34
fast max aperture (f2.0)
features face detect focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
includes microphone socket
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
more heavy than competition (507 grams)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony RX1R II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony RX1R II
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II
Class Pro Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2020-02-11 2015-10-13
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic IX BIONZ X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds Full frame
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 35.9 x 24mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 861.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 42MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 7952 x 5304
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Highest boosted ISO - 102400
Min native ISO 200 50
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 25
Cross type focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35mm (1x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0
Macro focusing distance - 14cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 1
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Tilting
Display sizing 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,037k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.74x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/4000 secs
Highest quiet shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 gr (1.28 lbs) 507 gr (1.12 lbs)
Physical dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 97
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.9
DXO Low light rating not tested 3204
Other
Battery life 420 photos 220 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-BX1
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2,5, 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Two One
Retail price $1,800 $3,300