Clicky

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35

Portability
67
Imaging
62
Features
96
Overall
75
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III front
 
Sony SLT-A35 front
Portability
69
Imaging
57
Features
70
Overall
62

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
  • Launched February 2020
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sony A35
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 415g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
  • Revealed September 2011
  • Older Model is Sony A33
  • Successor is Sony A37
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A35, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M1 III (20MP) and A35 (16MP) and the E-M1 III (Four Thirds) and A35 (APS-C) possess different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M1 III was introduced 8 years later than the A35 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A35 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-M1 III grades vs the A35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Sony A35

 E-M1 III A35 
RevealedFebruary 2020September 2011Fresher by 103 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen resolution1037k921kCrisper screen (+116k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A35 over the Olympus E-M1 III

 A35 E-M1 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A35

 E-M1 III A35 
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 III features external dimensions of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs) and the Sony A35 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 415 grams (0.91 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A35 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 III and the A35.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 III and A35 is 67 and 69 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing only by checking out specs. The graphic here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 III and A35.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 III with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M1 III will provide greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M1 III provides an edge in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Portrait photography camera
Sony A35 as a Portrait photography camera
77
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
74
manual focus
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
supports face detect focus
saves RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Street photography information
Sony A35 Street photography information
78
fully articulated screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
offers focus by touch
environment sealing
good high ISO (25,600)
71
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than competition in class (415g)
great high ISO (25,600)
screen does not articulate
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Sports photography details
Sony A35 Sports photography details
81
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
silent shooting (1/32,000s)
high max frames per second (60.0 frames/s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment sealing
sensor has phase detect auto focus
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (6.0 fps)
bad battery (440 CIPA)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III as a Travel photography camera
Sony A35 as a Travel photography camera
79
environment sealing
supports bluetooth
offers focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
display is selfie friendly
59
lighter than competition in class (415 grams)
decent megapixels (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse function
bad battery (440 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M1 III
Landscape photography with Sony A35
81
manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
no anti aliasing filter
good high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment sealing
has dual storage slots
69
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent megapixels (16MP)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
bad battery (440 CIPA)
lack of Timelapse function
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M1 III Vlogging features
Sony A35 Vlogging features
79
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (4096 x 2160 resolution)
includes external microphone jack
36
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
includes microphone support
lighter than competition in class (415g)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 III vs Sony A35 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 III and Sony A35
 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark IIISony SLT-A35
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III Sony SLT-A35
Class Pro Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2020-02-11 2011-09-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic IX Bionz
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 25600 25600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 64 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 121 15
Cross type focus points 121 3
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Available lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,037k dots 921k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 1,150k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 seconds -
Continuous shooting rate 60.0 frames per sec 6.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 12.00 m
Flash options Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 seconds 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 580 grams (1.28 lbs) 415 grams (0.91 lbs)
Dimensions 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.7
DXO Low light rating not tested 763
Other
Battery life 420 images 440 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLH-1 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec 3 or 5 images)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Two Single
Launch price $1,800 $598