Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/82a12/82a1263e2fcea5ac4d6bef1198741cbea2097fd0" alt="Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front Olympus Stylus XZ-10 front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Announced October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Released January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and XZ-10 (1/2.3") come with different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M1 was released 10 months later than the XZ-10 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-10 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M1 grades versus the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus XZ-10
E-M1 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2013 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 10 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper display (+117k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Olympus E-M1
XZ-10 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus XZ-10
E-M1 | XZ-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 has got outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use during that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M1 vs the XZ-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/555ba/555bacc5b2c01c06cc26162d5ac5d26d7dd5f763" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and XZ-10 is 71 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af21c/af21cf08cbf6f12c8d4e2d08f4e69b2ff6c32d5e" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor measurements purely by checking out specifications. The graphic here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and XZ-10.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 featuring a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 will show greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/895a3/895a3421fce9c5c4b17c405fd79388de599960ca" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f760a/f760a2786b7c933c7d5595b72d605615df1db396" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2013-10-28 | 2013-01-30 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/1.8-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497 grams (1.10 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 240 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $799 | $428 |