Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33564/33564fa180a03f0ad37d4e2877201fb0d473cbdb" alt="Olympus TG-810 front Olympus TG-810 front"
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced August 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus TG-810, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is pretty similar but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and TG-810 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M1 was revealed 2 years later than the TG-810 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-810 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M1 grades vs the TG-810 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Olympus TG-810. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus TG-810
E-M1 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2013 | ![]() | August 2011 | Fresher by 27 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+117k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Olympus E-M1
TG-810 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus TG-810
E-M1 | TG-810 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M1 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") having a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has specifications of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus TG-810 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M1 against the TG-810.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dcbe1/dcbe1e462bd863bbd92dda8d54a21ac8b052d391" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and TG-810 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c946/7c9462a810b60cc1d9c6487042d920a97f95e52c" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and TG-810.
As you can see, each of these cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M1 will offer more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M1 will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/efc49/efc49f9074a063476c702f5b8de9b9868491eb19" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dde13/dde139ba2e1ee6d0cacf25aeded3bc1246b3e6f7" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus TG-810 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Olympus TG-810 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,037 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 215g (0.47 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $799 | $428 |