Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Announced October 2013
  • Updated by Olympus E-M1 II
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Announced February 2011
  • Earlier Model is Olympus VR-320
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus VR-330, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M1 was brought out 2 years later than the VR-330 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M1 scores vs the VR-330 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Olympus VR-330

 E-M1 VR-330 
AnnouncedOctober 2013February 2011More recent by 34 months
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1037k460kCrisper screen (+577k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-M1

 VR-330 E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Olympus VR-330

 E-M1 VR-330 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M1 comes with outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M1 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M1 vs the VR-330.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and VR-330 is 71 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Often, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out specifications. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and VR-330.

Plainly, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M1 due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M1 will provide greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M1
Portrait photography with Olympus VR-330
71
you can focus manually
flash sync speed is above average (1/320s)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
33
megapixel count decent (14MP)
offers face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Street photography highlights
Olympus VR-330 Street photography highlights
78
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
supports touch focus
environment proof
lighter than others (497 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
62
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (158g)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Sports photography information
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography information
70
high shutter speed (1/8,000s)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
47
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
offers tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M1 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
65
lighter than others (497 grams)
environment proof
supports touch focus
good resolution (16MP)
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
70
lighter than others (158 grams)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
very long reach (300mm)
missing Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Landscape photography camera
73
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
not so great battery pack (350 shots)
42
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual mode not available
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1
Vlogging with Olympus VR-330
36
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
high video quality (1920 x 1080 pixels)
comes with external mic socket
lighter than others (497g)
display isn't selfie friendly
32
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers face detection focus
lighter than others (158 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M1 Olympus VR-330
Type Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2013-10-28 2011-02-08
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePIC VII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-300mm (12.5x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 1,037k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 10.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 4.70 m
Flash settings Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize 1/320 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 497 grams (1.10 lbs) 158 grams (0.35 lbs)
Dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light rating 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLN-1 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Card slots Single Single
Launch pricing $799 $220