Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a056/9a0560529b2d7cdf5610656aaa640a5f52dfa356" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front"
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Introduced October 2013
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Old Model is Panasonic GF1
- Replacement is Panasonic GF3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic GF2, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and GF2 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (Four Thirds).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The E-M1 was released 2 years after the GF2 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M1 scores versus the GF2 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery & Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Panasonic GF2
E-M1 | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | October 2013 | ![]() | February 2011 | More modern by 33 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+577k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus E-M1
GF2 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic GF2
E-M1 | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M1 features physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF2 has measurements of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 and Panasonic GF2 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M1 and the GF2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b017a/b017ad02baba9c7d8be43e8e97d005499108ae3d" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M1 and GF2 is 71 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9783/c9783c088af00696f3f16c1bc19f14515fbfcd44" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes purely by reading specifications. The pic underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and GF2.
To sum up, both of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can expect to see the Olympus E-M1 to offer more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M1 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a661/4a6614d76d65f0368044fc03a82afd3b9e38edea" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/51db5/51db5e820f23623eaff5f424a1180f83bbf7e328" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2013-10-28 | 2011-02-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePIC VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,037 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/320s | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lbs) | 310g (0.68 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 54 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 10.3 |
DXO Low light score | 757 | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 300 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $799 | $330 |