Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4e742/4e74284e98f8a2f698e6b96487e93d8958a78f02" alt="Ricoh CX4 front Ricoh CX4 front"
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Successor is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Announced August 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the E-M1 (16MP) and CX4 (10MP) and the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and CX4 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M1 was unveiled 3 years later than the CX4 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M1 matches up against the CX4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Ricoh CX4. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Ricoh CX4
E-M1 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2013 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1037k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer screen (+117k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus E-M1
CX4 | E-M1 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Ricoh CX4
E-M1 | CX4 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 has physical dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") and a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has sizing of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M1 versus the CX4.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/887b3/887b3ee0112a2184b24e05d7f6ccfd85deeb3885" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M1 and CX4 is 71 and 92 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec417/ec417f3cff212c79d9a5a5361955cba403085551" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and CX4.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M1 will resolve extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The newer E-M1 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6c51/b6c51ac8e29aa566001fa55a7c6cbcd96f178ed4" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7af15/7af15640a874b6957a1bd50460fdb9461b1a10fb" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Ricoh CX4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Ricoh CX4 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2010-08-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePIC VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,037k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 10.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 497 gr (1.10 lbs) | 205 gr (0.45 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.7 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 757 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLN-1 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $799 | $211 |