Clicky

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V

Portability
71
Imaging
53
Features
85
Overall
65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V front
Portability
66
Imaging
42
Features
55
Overall
47

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Key Specs

Olympus E-M1
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
  • Revealed October 2013
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sony HX200V
(Full Review)
  • 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 27-810mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
  • 583g - 122 x 87 x 93mm
  • Released May 2012
  • Older Model is Sony HX100V
  • Refreshed by Sony HX300
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Overview

Here, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M1 and Sony HX200V, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the HX200V (18MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and HX200V (1/2.3") posses different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M1 was brought out 18 months later than the HX200V which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX200V being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the E-M1 matches up versus the HX200V with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony HX200V

 E-M1 HX200V 
ReleasedOctober 2013May 2012Fresher by 18 months
Screen resolution1037k922kClearer screen (+115k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony HX200V over the Olympus E-M1

 HX200V E-M1 

Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony HX200V

 E-M1 HX200V 
Manually focus More exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen dimensions
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Physical Comparison

If you're aiming to carry your camera, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M1 offers outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) whilst the Sony HX200V has sizing of 122mm x 87mm x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7") having a weight of 583 grams (1.29 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M1 and Sony HX200V in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M1 vs the HX200V.

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and HX200V is 71 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The graphic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M1 and HX200V.

All in all, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M1 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Sony HX200V will resolve more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more recent E-M1 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Portrait photography highlights
Sony HX200V Portrait photography highlights
71
has manual focus
above average flash sync (1/320s)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
45
manual focus
megapixel count good (18MP)
supports face detect focus
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Street photography highlights
Sony HX200V Street photography highlights
78
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
provides touch to focus
environment proofing
lighter than competitors (497g)
very good ISO range (25,600)
51
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Optical)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than average (583g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Sports photography details
Sony HX200V Sports photography details
70
maximum shutter speed is high (1/8,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
comes with phase detect autofocus
low battery life (350 shots)
56
great zoom range (27-810mm 30.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18MP)
supports tracking focus
great battery power (450 per charge)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M1
Travel photography with Sony HX200V
65
lighter than competitors (497 grams)
environment proofing
provides touch to focus
decent MP (16MP)
low battery life (350 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
57
great battery power (450 per charge)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
has built in flash
decently wide (27mm)
very long zoom (810mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
more heavy than average (583 grams)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M1 Landscape photography info
Sony HX200V Landscape photography info
73
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
environment proofing
low battery life (350 per charge)
50
manual focus
decently wide (27mm)
good sized screen (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (18 megapixels)
great battery power (450 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M1
Vlogging with Sony HX200V
36
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does have external mic port
lighter than competitors (497g)
screen is not selfie friendly
27
decently wide (27mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
supports face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
more heavy than average (583g)
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M1 vs Sony HX200V Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M1 and Sony HX200V
 Olympus OM-D E-M1Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M1 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX200V
Class Pro Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2013-10-28 2012-05-11
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePIC VII BIONZ
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 18MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4896 x 3672
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-810mm (30.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of display Tilting Tilting
Display size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 1,037k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - XtraFine TruBlack TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.74x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/8000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 10.0 frames/s 10.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range no built-in flash 12.40 m
Flash options Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Rear Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/320 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 497 gr (1.10 lbs) 583 gr (1.29 lbs)
Physical dimensions 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") 122 x 87 x 93mm (4.8" x 3.4" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.0 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.7 not tested
DXO Low light score 757 not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures 450 pictures
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLN-1 NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $799 $480