Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III
71 Imaging
52 Features
85 Overall
65
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/994ef/994ef7dee173aff9e3dc7d1b78984f0f0b8bbe9f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M1 front Olympus OM-D E-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6eadd/6eadd23cb6eb920907ea68f225c04742fabb0e6f" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
77 Overall
62
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 497g - 130 x 94 x 63mm
- Launched October 2013
- Later Model is Olympus E-M1 II
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
- 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
- Announced March 2016
- Succeeded the Sony RX10 II
- Newer Model is Sony RX10 IV
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M1 and Sony RX10 III, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the E-M1 (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very comparable but the E-M1 (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M1 was manufactured 3 years prior to the RX10 III which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M1 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M1 grades against the RX10 III when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M1 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M1 Gallery and Sony RX10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 over the Sony RX10 III
E-M1 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-M1
RX10 III | E-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | March 2016 | ![]() | October 2013 | More modern by 29 months |
Display resolution | 1229k | ![]() | 1037k | Clearer display (+192k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M1 and Sony RX10 III
E-M1 | RX10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M1 features outer dimensions of 130mm x 94mm x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") with a weight of 497 grams (1.10 lbs) while the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") and a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M1 and Sony RX10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M1 and the RX10 III.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97e64/97e64ab0e01dc5dd566ca2ae787d2a3c0de548f8" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M1 and RX10 III is 71 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80c0f/80c0f6d9f59e87c84baeac51e7d260fe1c8f9104" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The picture below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M1 and RX10 III.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M1 due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Sony RX10 III will produce extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged E-M1 will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71090/71090fc619a374ff5c9aab55f83196baf49fa2f2" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0e7b/e0e7b52e930a5d9b8182012cdf66a147917d874c" alt="Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M1 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-10-28 | 2016-03-29 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePIC VII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-600mm (25.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.4-4.0 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,037 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.74x | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 10.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 10.80 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Flash Auto, Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (1st curtain), Slow sync (2nd curtain), Manual | Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/320 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 497g (1.10 lb) | 1051g (2.32 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 94 x 63mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.5") | 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.0 | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.7 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 757 | 472 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 420 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLN-1 | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $799 | $1,398 |