Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
86 Imaging
47 Features
42 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 355g - 121 x 70 x 36mm
- Introduced April 2010
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-P1
- Replacement is Olympus E-P3
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus E-P2, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras and both are produced by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and E-P2 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 II was released 5 years later than the E-P2 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-P2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the E-P2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus PEN E-P2. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus E-P2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus E-P2
E-M10 II | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | April 2010 | More recent by 66 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-P2 over the Olympus E-M10 II
E-P2 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus E-P2
E-M10 II | E-P2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II provides external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus E-P2 has specifications of 121mm x 70mm x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus E-P2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the E-P2.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and E-P2 is 82 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements simply by researching specifications. The photograph below should provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and E-P2.
To sum up, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus E-M10 II to provide you with extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus E-P2 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-P2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus PEN E-P2 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2010-04-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 107 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | HyperCrystal LCD with AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 355 grams (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 121 x 70 x 36mm (4.8" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 56 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 505 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $499 | $799 |