Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front
Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
42
Overall
40

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M10 II was announced 7 months later than the TG-860 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M10 II scores versus the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-860

 E-M10 II TG-860 
AnnouncedAugust 2015February 2015More recent by 7 months
Manual focus Very precise focus
Display resolution1040k460kSharper display (+580k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 TG-860 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860

 E-M10 II TG-860 
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II vs the TG-860.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and TG-860 is 82 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TG-860.

As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same MP but different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II contains the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography advice
Olympus TG-860 Portrait photography advice
72
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect focusing
exports RAW files
35
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Street photography with Olympus TG-860
83
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
69
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
weather proof
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Olympus TG-860
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
no phase detect AF
48
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features tracking focus
weather proof
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-860 Travel photography highlights
73
features focus via touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
71
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (21mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-860 Landscape photography information
79
has manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
47
reasonably wide (21mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
weather proof
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
manual mode not possible
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-860 Vlogging advice
35
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
lack of microphone socket
33
reasonably wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus Stylus Tough TG-860
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Released 2015-08-25 2015-02-06
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 7.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Yes
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lb) 224 grams (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos 300 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $499 $279