Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/042ab/042ab9bda5359b24c15525e105c8dbb85792e213" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
42 Overall
40
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced February 2015
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-870
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 7 months later than the TG-860 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick summation of how the E-M10 II scores versus the TG-860 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-860 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-860
E-M10 II | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | ![]() | February 2015 | More recent by 7 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-860 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860
E-M10 II | TG-860 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-860 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-860 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II vs the TG-860.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/07965/0796562c55a9a54a2bf87091439677d8ca05c8b8" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and TG-860 is 82 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c2e9/2c2e9539e75681a2e6d42be64929b9c53dd53c05" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here will help provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TG-860.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got the exact same MP but different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II contains the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF less difficult. The fresher E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db512/db512e827074cbebd7feaaa64bdbdeadfe51c6bb" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a5b4/2a5b43c081da226c83570c4fd1761a617b3b1af8" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2015-02-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Yes |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 224 grams (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $499 | $279 |