Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4
Portability
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-4 (16MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-4 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was announced 5 months after the TG-4 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 II grades against the TG-4 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus Tough TG-4. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-4
| E-M10 II | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| TG-4 | E-M10 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-4
| E-M10 II | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2015 |  | April 2015 | Same age |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II features external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-4 has proportions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-4 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II versus the TG-4.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-4 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The image below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and TG-4.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II features the bigger sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF simpler.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect focus
delivers RAW files
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
has face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
manual mode not possible
no external flash support
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Street photography info
Olympus TG-4 Street photography info
tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
offers focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
weather proof
screen is fixed
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
more heavy than average (247 grams)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
has tracking focus
weather proof
good battery (380 shots)
slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-4 as a Travel photography camera
offers focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
good battery (380 per charge)
weather proof
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average (247 grams)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-4 Landscape photography information
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
focusing manually
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
saves RAW files
weather proof
good battery (380 per charge)
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Olympus TG-4
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic support
decently wide (25mm)
good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
does not have microphone jack
more heavy than average (247g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-4 |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2015-04-13 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Available lenses | 107 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 247g (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | 380 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $499 | $379 |