Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M10 II was introduced 3 years after the VG-160 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M10 II grades against the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VG-160
E-M10 II | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | More modern by 45 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M10 II
VG-160 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-160
E-M10 II | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II versus the VG-160.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd476/cd47664a1cd2e49e910bf42ae5f803ec4329070e" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and VG-160 is 82 and 96 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44976/44976e5f3c5b2f1a512af139dd7989639c17448a" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and VG-160.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d42a/4d42a49d94be65f6b98bd7262dbfc850b4e7eaec" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d7cab/d7cabe81b8b76237844f407d7ecb485d35cff5dd" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 7cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 125g (0.28 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 165 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $499 | $90 |