Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus VG-160 front
Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Overview

Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VG-160 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 II was introduced 3 years after the VG-160 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the E-M10 II grades against the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VG-160

 E-M10 II VG-160 
LaunchedAugust 2015January 2012More modern by 45 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 VG-160 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-160

 E-M10 II VG-160 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display dimensions
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison

If you're looking to carry around your camera, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II versus the VG-160.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and VG-160 is 82 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and VG-160.

Clearly, both of those cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Portrait photography camera
72
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features face detection autofocus
supports RAW formats
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has face detect focusing
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
can't use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography advice
Olympus VG-160 Street photography advice
83
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
supports touch focus
very good high ISO (25,600)
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Olympus VG-160
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
no phase detect autofocus
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
bad battery life (165 shots)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
73
supports touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
built-in flash
screen is not selfie friendly
65
lighter than competition (125 grams)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (165 shots)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
79
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
36
really wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
decent megapixels (14MP)
no manual focus
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
bad battery life (165 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging details
Olympus VG-160 Vlogging details
35
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
no external mic port
30
really wide (26mm)
has face detect focusing
lighter than competition (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-160
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus VG-160
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus VG-160
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Released 2015-08-25 2012-01-10
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW images
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 81 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 7cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 8.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390g (0.86 lbs) 125g (0.28 lbs)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 165 images
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch price $499 $90