Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus XZ-2 iHS front
Portability
85
Imaging
37
Features
67
Overall
49

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus XZ-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
  • 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
  • Revealed December 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview

On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor size.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M10 II was released 2 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M10 II scores against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 II XZ-2 iHS 
RevealedAugust 2015December 2012More modern by 33 months
Screen resolution1040k920kSharper screen (+120k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II

 XZ-2 iHS E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS

 E-M10 II XZ-2 iHS 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the XZ-2 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and XZ-2 iHS is 82 and 85 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The image below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and XZ-2 iHS.

All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Portrait photography highlights
72
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
46
has manual focus
supports face detection focus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography highlights
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Street photography highlights
83
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
supports touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
66
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
more heavy than others (346g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus XZ-2 iHS as a Sports photography camera
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect AF
43
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking autofocus
great battery power (340 CIPA)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography features
Olympus XZ-2 iHS Travel photography features
73
supports touch to focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
61
great battery power (340 shots)
has built in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
does not have Timelapse recording
more heavy than others (346 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
79
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
55
has manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
exports RAW formats
great battery power (340 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/1.7")
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Olympus XZ-2 iHS
35
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
36
fairly wide (28mm)
fast maximum aperture (f1.8)
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does have external microphone socket
display is not selfie friendly
more heavy than others (346g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus XZ-2 iHS
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus XZ-2 iHS
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2015-08-25 2012-12-18
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 25600 12800
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points 81 35
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-112mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture - f/1.8-2.5
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 4.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Tilting
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic (optional)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 60 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 8.60 m (ISO 800)
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 gr (0.86 lb) 346 gr (0.76 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 49
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 20.4
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 11.3
DXO Low light rating 842 216
Other
Battery life 320 photos 340 photos
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 Li-90B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $499 $450