Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d2439/d243927345de5a095aa4910f1a6bf1f8c46d0250" alt="Olympus XZ-2 iHS front Olympus XZ-2 iHS front"
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Revealed December 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are sold by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and XZ-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") boast different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 II was released 2 years after the XZ-2 iHS which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief overview of how the E-M10 II scores against the XZ-2 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M10 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | December 2012 | More modern by 33 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Sharper screen (+120k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
XZ-2 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
E-M10 II | XZ-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has sizing of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the XZ-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd78c/cd78c575ed8e735279c28f6a5cbea825fc6c00fe" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and XZ-2 iHS is 82 and 85 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7a804/7a8043b704c270f1c8f2d94b29f737fd428279ab" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the difference in sensor sizes just by checking out specs. The image below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and XZ-2 iHS.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21269/212691ee8466b2e50561c82aaec8b58fc4f3bb22" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/420fb/420fbdec31f3080b3276d8e725ceb154ac2af374" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-12-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 346 gr (0.76 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 49 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 20.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 11.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 216 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 340 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $450 |