Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
93 Imaging
36 Features
36 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.9-5.7) lens
- 193g - 108 x 58 x 24mm
- Released November 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Overview
Below is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic 3D1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and 3D1 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and 3D1 (1/2.3") use different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 II was manufactured 3 years later than the 3D1 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic 3D1 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M10 II grades versus the 3D1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic 3D1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic 3D1
E-M10 II | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | November 2011 | More recent by 47 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic 3D1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
3D1 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic 3D1
E-M10 II | 3D1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic 3D1 has dimensions of 108mm x 58mm x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic 3D1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II versus the 3D1.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and 3D1 is 82 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor measurements just by checking out technical specs. The graphic here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and 3D1.
As you can tell, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide extra detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic 3D1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-3D1 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-11-07 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.9-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Full Touch Screen with AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1300 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 108 x 58 x 24mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 200 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $670 |