Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
95 Imaging
35 Features
31 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
- 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Launched January 2011
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Overview
Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FX78, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 II was released 4 years later than the FX78 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades vs the FX78 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic FX78 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FX78
E-M10 II | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | January 2011 | Fresher by 56 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FX78 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FX78
E-M10 II | FX78 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Panasonic FX78 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the FX78.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and FX78 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and FX78.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 |
Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-FX77 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-01-25 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 142g (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 200 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $499 | $210 |