Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78 front
Portability
95
Imaging
35
Features
31
Overall
33

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Panasonic FX78
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-120mm (F2.5-5.9) lens
  • 142g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Launched January 2011
  • Also Known as Lumix DMC-FX77
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Overview

Here is a extended comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FX78, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FX78 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FX78 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor sizes.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M10 II was released 4 years later than the FX78 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FX78 being a Compact camera.

Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades vs the FX78 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FX78

 E-M10 II FX78 
LaunchedAugust 2015January 2011Fresher by 56 months
Manually focus Very exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)

Reasons to pick Panasonic FX78 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 FX78 E-M10 II 
Screen dimensions3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FX78

 E-M10 II FX78 
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Panasonic FX78 has dimensions of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FX78 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the FX78.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and FX78 is 82 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The visual below might give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and FX78.

As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
Panasonic FX78 Portrait photography highlights
72
focusing manually
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes face detect autofocus
delivers RAW files
21
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Street photography camera
83
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
comes with focus via touch
good high ISO (25,600)
57
image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography advice
Panasonic FX78 Sports photography advice
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
has no phase detect autofocus
28
image stabilization (Optical)
offers tracking autofocus
low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
very slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (200 shots)
does not have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Panasonic FX78
73
comes with focus via touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
56
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
does not have Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (200 per charge)
MP count low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Landscape photography camera
Panasonic FX78 as a Landscape photography camera
79
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
36
pretty wide (24mm)
lovely big screen (3.5")
image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery pack (200 shots)
does not have Time Lapse function
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Panasonic FX78
35
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing mic jack
33
pretty wide (24mm)
touchscreen enabled
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic jack
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FX78 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FX78
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
General Information
Make Olympus Panasonic
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX78
Also called as - Lumix DMC-FX77
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2015-08-25 2011-01-25
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine FHD
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 81 11
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-120mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3.5 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/1400 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 8.0fps 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390g (0.86 pounds) 142g (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images 200 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $499 $210