Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
90 Imaging
37 Features
57 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 243g - 111 x 65 x 34mm
- Released January 2015
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ70
- Replaced the Panasonic ZS45
- Successor is Panasonic ZS60
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic ZS50, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and ZS50 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZS50 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 II was announced 8 months after the ZS50 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 II grades versus the ZS50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZS50
E-M10 II | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | January 2015 | More modern by 8 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS50 over the Olympus E-M10 II
ZS50 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZS50
E-M10 II | ZS50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1040k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS50 has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic ZS50 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II vs the ZS50.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and ZS50 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The pic here will help give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and ZS50.
Plainly, both cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II having a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS50 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS50 |
Also called | - | Lumix DMC-TZ70 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2015-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-6.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 1,166 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p/60i/30p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 243 grams (0.54 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 111 x 65 x 34mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 44 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 11.2 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 138 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $350 |