Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced July 2013
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax WG-3, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the WG-3 (16MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and WG-3 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was announced 2 years later than the WG-3 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-3 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the E-M10 II scores vs the WG-3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Pentax WG-3. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Pentax WG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax WG-3
E-M10 II | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | July 2013 | More recent by 26 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-3 over the Olympus E-M10 II
WG-3 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax WG-3
E-M10 II | WG-3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Pentax WG-3 has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax WG-3 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II versus the WG-3.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and WG-3 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the gap between sensor measurements merely by looking at a spec sheet. The visual here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and WG-3.
Clearly, both the cameras come with the identical resolution albeit not the same sensor measurements. The E-M10 II features the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow DOF simpler. The more recent E-M10 II will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-3 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax WG-3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax WG-3 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | - | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.40 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 240 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $499 | $300 |