Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched April 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX1000
- New Model is Samsung NX2000
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX1100, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX1100 (20MP) is very similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX1100 (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was brought out 2 years after the NX1100 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX1100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II grades versus the NX1100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung NX1100. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung NX1100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX1100
E-M10 II | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | April 2013 | More modern by 29 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1100 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX1100 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX1100
E-M10 II | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II has external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX1100 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX1100 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II versus the NX1100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and NX1100 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes purely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and NX1100.
As you can see, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II due to its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF more difficult and the Samsung NX1100 will offer you greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX1100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX1100 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-04-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 222 gr (0.49 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 852 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 320 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $499 | $600 |