Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
90 Imaging
61 Features
57 Overall
59
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
- Introduced February 2012
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX100
- Successor is Samsung NX210
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX200, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX200 (20MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX200 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 II was brought out 3 years later than the NX200 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 II grades against the NX200 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung NX200. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung NX200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX200
E-M10 II | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | February 2012 | More recent by 43 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 614k | Crisper display (+426k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX200 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX200
E-M10 II | NX200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung NX200 has specifications of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") with a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX200 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II vs the NX200.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and NX200 is 82 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to picture the difference in sensor measurements merely by going through specifications. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and NX200.
To sum up, each of the cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II featuring a smaller sensor is going to make shooting bokeh trickier and the Samsung NX200 will provide greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX200 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX200 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-02-28 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 7.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 223 gr (0.49 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | 69 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 618 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 330 photos |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $499 | $818 |