Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce26f/ce26f126ddb897ecf80630f38a706a60c1b9d696" alt="Samsung NX30 front Samsung NX30 front"
75 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 375g - 127 x 96 x 58mm
- Introduced January 2014
- Previous Model is Samsung NX20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Overview
The following is a complete review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX30, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX30 (20MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX30 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 20 months after the NX30 making them a generation away from one another. Both the cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 II scores vs the NX30 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung NX30. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung NX30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX30
E-M10 II | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2014 | Newer by 20 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1036k | Crisper display (+4k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX30 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX30 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX30
E-M10 II | NX30 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX30 has dimensions of 127mm x 96mm x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") and a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II versus the NX30.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e74/f4e7413f6feb44548d44470e99bcdc49ef2d8afa" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and NX30 is 82 and 75 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b638d/b638d9be6c9b192bd20a271a0e5993df734a48e4" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and NX30.
Clearly, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Samsung NX30 will give more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64658/6465845d8c5b082e12466382da0f71443718ad02" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9978b/9978b682a69a208cb6851a9d26772cb358803655" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX30 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX30 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX30 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2014-01-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | DRIMeIV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 1,036k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.66x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 9.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 375 gr (0.83 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 127 x 96 x 58mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 77 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 23.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 1014 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 360 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1410 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $499 | $699 |