Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung WB210, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and WB210 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was launched 4 years after the WB210 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M10 II grades against the WB210 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung WB210
E-M10 II | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | July 2011 | Newer by 50 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 1k | Crisper display (+1039k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus E-M10 II
WB210 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3.5" | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung WB210
E-M10 II | WB210 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera, you will want to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB210 has measurements of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II versus the WB210.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and WB210 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions simply by seeing specs. The pic here may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and WB210.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung WB210 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung WB210 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 174g (0.38 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $279 |