Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
62 Imaging
46 Features
51 Overall
48
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced December 2016
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Overview
Let's look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX350, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the HX350 (20MP) is very close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HX350 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was introduced 16 months before the HX350 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II scores against the HX350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony HX350
E-M10 II | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Clearer display (+118k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Olympus E-M10 II
HX350 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2016 | August 2015 | More recent by 16 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX350
E-M10 II | HX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") and a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony HX350 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the HX350.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and HX350 is 82 and 62 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements simply by viewing specifications. The photograph below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and HX350.
To sum up, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Sony HX350 will render more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The older E-M10 II will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony HX350 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2016-12-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 202 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 652 grams (1.44 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 300 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $499 | - |