Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Revealed March 2016
  • Previous Model is Sony RX10 II
  • Replacement is Sony RX10 IV
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Overview

In this article, we are comparing the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX10 III, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the RX10 III (20MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and RX10 III (1") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M10 II was introduced 7 months earlier than the RX10 III so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 II grades versus the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony RX10 III

 E-M10 II RX10 III 
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus E-M10 II

 RX10 III E-M10 II 
RevealedMarch 2016August 2015Newer by 7 months
Display resolution1229k1040kCrisper display (+189k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX10 III

 E-M10 II RX10 III 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has dimensions of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") accompanied by a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX10 III in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II against the RX10 III.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and RX10 III is 82 and 53 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very difficult to envision the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and RX10 III.

As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor will make getting shallow depth of field simpler and the Sony RX10 III will provide more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop photos far more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 II will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Portrait photography with Sony RX10 III
72
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
71
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
comes with face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography details
Sony RX10 III Street photography details
83
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
comes with focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
64
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Optical)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
heavier than competition (1,051g)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Sony RX10 III
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
offers tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
70
incredible zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
silent mode (1/32,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20 megapixels)
good sensor size (1")
comes with tracking autofocus
environment proofing
better than average battery (420 shots)
does not have phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Sony RX10 III
73
comes with focus by touch
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not posses selfie friendly screen
55
better than average battery (420 CIPA)
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (20MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (24mm)
great reach (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (1,051g)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography highlights
Sony RX10 III Landscape photography highlights
79
you can focus manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
64
focusing manually
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (20MP)
good sensor size (1")
saves RAW formats
environment proofing
better than average battery (420 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Sony RX10 III
35
screen is touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no mic support
28
rather wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
does have external mic socket
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
screen is not selfie friendly
heavier than competition (1,051 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2015-08-25 2016-03-29
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Highest boosted ISO - 25600
Minimum native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Minimum boosted ISO 100 64
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 81 25
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 24-600mm (25.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.4-4.0
Macro focusing distance - 3cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 2.7
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,229k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 2,359k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.7x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed - 1/32000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second 14.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lbs) 1051 grams (2.32 lbs)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 70
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 12.6
DXO Low light rating 842 472
Other
Battery life 320 shots 420 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Launch price $499 $1,398