Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Launched February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Overview

Following is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony T900, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a substantial gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and T900 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and T900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 II was manufactured 6 years after the T900 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the T900 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

				

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony T900

 E-M10 II T900 
LaunchedAugust 2015February 2009More modern by 80 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k922kClearer display (+118k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 T900 E-M10 II 
Display dimensions3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony T900

 E-M10 II T900 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony T900 has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") with a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Check out the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony T900 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II vs the T900.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and T900 is 82 and 96 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing technical specs. The picture below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and T900.

As you can tell, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II featuring a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography features
Sony T900 Portrait photography features
71
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection focusing
delivers RAW formats
27
focusing manually
no manual mode
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Street photography with Sony T900
82
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
has touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography highlights
Sony T900 Sports photography highlights
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Sony T900
73
has touch to focus
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
does not have selfie friendly display
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
low resolution sensor (12MP)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Sony T900
79
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
36
focusing manually
big screen (3.5 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging info
Sony T900 Vlogging info
35
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not have selfie friendly display
no external mic port
28
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not great (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony T900
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Make Olympus Sony
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Released 2015-08-25 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-140mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.5-10.0
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3.5 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 922k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 2 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/1000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 gr (0.86 pounds) 143 gr (0.32 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $499 $300