Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66ec3/66ec316340c681a5b653dffd1598d7db3bc6344d" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front"
97 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the W320 (14MP) is relatively comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and W320 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 5 years after the W320 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony W320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 II grades vs the W320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Sony W320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony W320
E-M10 II | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | Newer by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Olympus E-M10 II
W320 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony W320
E-M10 II | W320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II features external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony W320 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II vs the W320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/96296/9629655b3318b7d15cc80edafa8b627bc8521fad" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and W320 is 82 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d4b9/3d4b98729025fe8d5a9cd14650a3eb9fd29fb378" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and W320.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/442c7/442c7506a0276ab1293509d43f58a7d7a0df5368" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d5d7/2d5d7e7c9178477b9e20c72204216d8e2e964060" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony W320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 4cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 117 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $499 | $269 |