Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


64 Imaging
63 Features
85 Overall
71
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Revealed November 2011
- Later Model is Sony A68

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A65, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and A65 (24MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and A65 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor sizing.

The E-M10 II was brought out 3 years later than the A65 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 II grades against the A65 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Sony SLT-A65. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony A65
E-M10 II | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | November 2011 | Fresher by 46 months |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer screen (+119k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Olympus E-M10 II
A65 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A65
E-M10 II | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera often, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II provides outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sony A65 has proportions of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") having a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A65 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the A65.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and A65 is 82 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The photograph underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and A65.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Sony A65 will give extra detail having its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A65 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony SLT-A65 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2011-11-15 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 24MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Total lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 10.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 622g (1.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 560 photographs |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $499 | $700 |