Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is mju Tough 6020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Below, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 6020, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and 6020 (13MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and 6020 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was released 10 years after the 6020 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus 6020 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M10 IV scores vs the 6020 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus 6020
E-M10 IV | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2020 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 128 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
6020 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 6020
E-M10 IV | 6020 |
---|
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV provides outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Olympus 6020 has specifications of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV and the 6020.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14c70/14c7044b0e71357c91cc90699ffbf987d72c4bae" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 IV and 6020 is 81 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e3ab/9e3ab013feba6e6ad4226d82ba8efc967f1e74fa" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by checking technical specs. The image here should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 IV and 6020.
As you have seen, each of the cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will give you more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV is going to have a benefit in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ac3e/9ac3ebeac1b49c2dbfc741fb5c5b8382d146e927" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c0736/c07364da32ebc75cf88f70ad58616581d9414d64" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Also called | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2010-02-02 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 13MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 1/4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lbs) | 122 gr (0.27 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $699 | $279 |