Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41c7c/41c7c096f5b120d51cec7dfdff2b001e8780d88f" alt="Olympus TG-630 iHS front Olympus TG-630 iHS front"
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Introduced August 2020
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Here is a in depth review of the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was introduced 7 years later than the TG-630 iHS and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the E-M10 IV grades versus the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M10 IV | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | ![]() | January 2013 | Fresher by 93 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 IV
TG-630 iHS | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M10 IV | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen size |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 IV has got exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) while the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the TG-630 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0699/d0699104341e9900c84d6ca09315d32ad1f4f16e" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and TG-630 iHS is 81 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/746cc/746cc221f8e189d63996e2f81c1bc6c154a237b1" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and TG-630 iHS.
As you can see, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV having a bigger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 IV will provide you with more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger E-M10 IV will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6baa3/6baa34d7c45102d1e84bdadd36634b1aac428cdc" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d416/8d4167cbbca5311680e3a7f2fc6e58336a6ea5a1" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2020-08-04 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 gr (0.84 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photographs | 220 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $699 | $200 |