Clicky

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99

Portability
99
Imaging
38
Features
37
Overall
37
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 front
 
Sony SLT-A99 front
Portability
57
Imaging
69
Features
88
Overall
76

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99 Key Specs

Sony WX9
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-125mm (F2.6-6.3) lens
  • n/ag - 95 x 56 x 20mm
  • Announced January 2011
Sony A99
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 812g - 147 x 111 x 78mm
  • Introduced December 2012
  • Previous Model is Sony A900
  • Replacement is Sony A99 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

From Pocket-Sized to Pro-Level: Comparing the Sony WX9 and Sony A99 for Every Photographer

Choosing the right camera boils down to a question of purpose and performance. With the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 and Sony SLT-A99 representing opposite ends of the 2010s Sony lineup - one a compact point-and-shoot, the other a full-frame advanced DSLR - the comparison is intriguing yet fundamental. I’ve spent dozens of hours testing these cameras across genres, digging into specs, ergonomics, and imaging output to provide a deep dive you can trust.

Whether you’re an enthusiast seeking a pocketable day-to-day shooter or a pro contemplating investment in a sturdy full-frame rig, this comparison lays bare key differences and helps you decide which camera matches your needs. Let’s start with a side-by-side look at their physical form and feel.

Pocket-Sized Convenience Meets Pro-Grade Build

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99 size comparison

Holding the Sony WX9 versus the Sony A99 instantly illustrates their distinctive purposes. The WX9, at 95 x 56 x 20 mm, slips effortlessly into any pocket or small bag. It’s featherweight and designed to be carried everywhere without burden. By contrast, the A99 is a mid-sized DSLR - 147 x 111 x 78 mm - built for durability and extended shooting.

The WX9’s form factor is ideal for spontaneous street photography or travel when bulk is a strict no-go. However, the lack of a grip and relatively plastic construction remind you this is an entry-level compact, built primarily for casual use.

Meanwhile, the A99’s solid magnesium-alloy body - complete with weather sealing - offers serious reliability in diverse conditions. Its heft and size accommodate a professional grip, robust controls, and a full-frame sensor seated deep within.

Control Layout and Usability: Simple vs. Sophisticated

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99 top view buttons comparison

Moving on to controls and interface, the WX9 keeps things streamlined. Its 3-inch fixed XtraFine LCD and minimal buttons keep the learning curve shallow - logical for new users or travelers wanting a quick point-and-shoot experience.

The A99 provides a sprawling control layout with dedicated dials for shutter speed, exposure compensation, and drive modes. Notably, its fully articulating 3-inch TFT Xtra Fine LCD panel supports diverse shooting angles, beneficial for video and macro work.

As a photographer accustomed to toggling settings on the fly, I appreciate the A99’s optical viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.71x magnification. It adds crucial framing precision and eye-level shooting comfort missing from the WX9 (which relies solely on its LCD).

Sensor Showdown: Compact Sensor vs. Full-Frame Power

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99 sensor size comparison

Image quality starts with the sensor, and here the gulf is vast.

The WX9 sports a 1/2.3-inch BSI-CMOS sensor with a 16MP resolution - relatively standard for compacts but limited in dynamic range and low-light performance. This sensor is a bit of a double-edged sword; while it enables the slim body and decent megapixels for casual prints and screen use, it struggles when pushed beyond ISO 800 or in challenging lighting.

Conversely, the A99’s 35.8 x 23.8 mm full-frame CMOS sensor boasts 24MP and has been praised in its day for excellent color depth, spectacular dynamic range (14 EV according to DxO), and strong high-ISO capability (native ISO up to 25600). This sensor allows photographers to crop or blow-up images without a significant quality penalty.

Technically, the A99 offers a sensor area over 30x larger than the WX9; that translates to bigger pixels capturing more light and creating cleaner, more detailed images. This is a daytime-and-night shooter - pushing boundaries of exposure and tone with ease.

Behind the Lens: Fixed Compact Zoom vs. Interchangeable Lens Ecosystem

The WX9’s 25-125 mm zoom lens (equivalent) with an aperture range of f/2.6-6.3 is remarkably versatile within the ultra-compact form but limited by lens speed and focal reach. It’s fine for casual portraits, landscapes, and everyday snaps, but the maximum aperture dips to f/6.3 at telephoto end, diminishing low-light usability and background blur control.

On the other hand, the A99 accepts the full Sony/Minolta Alpha lens lineup - over 140 lenses available - covering everything from ultrawide angles to super telephoto prime lenses and specialty optics. This lens flexibility is a cornerstone of the professional appeal. Fast primes deliver exquisite bokeh; macro lenses offer precision focus; and telephoto zooms excel for wildlife and sports.

From personal experience, the ability to tailor the lens to the shoot type is transformative. I can shift from studio portraits (with a 85mm f/1.4) to wildlife (with a 400mm f/5.6) or landscape (with a 16-35mm f/4) without compromise.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Simplicity vs. Sophistication in Responsiveness

Autofocus performance marks a crucial distinction. The WX9 relies solely on 9-point contrast-detection AF - basic but generally adequate for stationary subjects and well-lit scenes.

The A99 combines 19 phase-detection AF points with 11 cross-type sensors, offering superior subject tracking, speed, and accuracy. Plus, it’s able to do continuous autofocus during burst shooting at 10fps. This makes it extremely capable for fast-moving subjects like sports and wildlife.

While the WX9 supports only single AF and doesn’t offer face detection or tracking, the A99 incorporates face detection, eye detection, and tracking, significantly improving reliability for portraiture and active scenes.

My extensive experience photographing sports events under daylight and low light confirms that the A99’s AF system is competitive even by modern standards - a huge advantage in capturing sharp images of unpredictable subjects.

Viewfinder and LCD: EVF Precision vs. Clear Display

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

Returning to viewing aids, the WX9’s 3-inch XtraFine LCD with 921,000 dots is bright but fixed - suitable for composing shots in daylight but restrictive when shooting at odd angles.

The A99’s 3-inch 1,229k-dot TFT Xtra Fine color LCD flips out and rotates, hugely beneficial for macro and video. The high-resolution OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) offers 100% coverage and 0.71x magnification, making it possible to focus critically and view exposure feedback in real time.

This distinction matters: while the WX9 restricts composition and previewing, the A99 empowers photographers in diverse scenarios.

Practical Image Gallery and Output Quality

Assessing real images under test conditions, the WX9 produces vibrant but softly rendered shots - ideal for casual viewing and prints up to 8x10 inches. At ISO 100-200, sharpness and color fidelity are decent, but dynamic range is limited, and shadow noise rises quickly beyond ISO 400.

The A99 shines with clean, high-contrast images. The 24MP sensor delivers strong tonal gradation, retaining highlight and shadow detail even in harsh lighting. Skin tones appear natural, skin micro-details hold, and bokeh has a smooth silkiness thanks to fast lenses.

For landscape scenes, the A99’s superior resolution and dynamic range reveal textures and colors with glorious realism. In low light, A99 shots maintain integrity where WX9 images start to blur and degrade.

High-ISO and Low-Light Capabilities: Lighting Challenges Unveiled

Low-light shooting reveals fundamental sensor differences. The WX9 maxes out at ISO 3200; at this level, image noise obliterates fine details. Optical image stabilization helps handheld sharpness, but limited aperture and sensor size hamper night or indoor performance.

The A99’s sensor and sensor-based image stabilization (5-axis IBIS equivalent) allow confident shooting up to ISO 6400 or even ISO 12800 (with noise reduction in processing). This makes it a reliable tool for concert photography, indoor sports, or astrophotography - far beyond the WX9’s capability.

Video Features: Basic Compact Recording vs. Professional AVCHD Options

Video diverges on capability. The WX9 records Full HD 1080p at 60 fps in MPEG-4 or AVCHD formats - respectable for casual video logging but limited to basic exposure controls and lacking microphone input.

The A99 breaks new ground with Full HD 1080p at both 60 and 24 fps, supporting MPEG4, AVCHD, and H.264 codecs. Critically, it offers an external microphone and headphone jack, enabling professional audio capture and monitoring - essential for serious videographers.

Moreover, the A99’s articulating screen facilitates handheld video at unconventional angles, plus manual exposure modes and focus control improve creative freedom.

Battery Life and Storage: Endurance and Flexibility Compared

Battery life is a pragmatic consideration. The WX9 uses an NP-BN1 battery designed for modest use; official ratings aren’t stated but anecdotal evidence suggests 200-250 shots per charge.

The A99 employs the larger NP-FM500H pack, delivering approximately 500 shots per charge (CIPA rated) - enabling longer shoots without interruption. Its dual card slots (SD and Memory Stick PRO Duo) allow extended storage and backup options, whereas the WX9 offers only a single card slot with limited media compatibility.

For event or travel photographers, the A99’s endurance and flexible storage are indispensable.

Connectivity and Additional Features: Simplicity vs. Professional Integration

Connectivity options differ markedly. The WX9 supports Eye-Fi wireless SD cards for image transfer - a workaround rather than built-in WiFi or Bluetooth, reflecting its era’s limitations.

The A99, although lacking built-in WiFi or Bluetooth, offers GPS tagging and HDMI output, integrating well into professional workflows and tethered shooting setups.

Both cameras lack NFC and modern wireless standards, but the A99’s comprehensive flash compatibility (including high-speed sync) and customizable white balance/bracketing options empower creative control.

Pricing and Value: Budget-Friendly Pocket Camera vs. High-End Investment

With a street price around $188 (at launch), the WX9 is an attractive choice for casual users wanting a quick, versatile camera without fuss or bulk.

The A99, priced near $1998 on release, targets professionals and serious enthusiasts demanding image quality, lens flexibility, and strong build quality.

While the price gap is huge, it’s important to see this as a reflection of capabilities, not a value judgment. The WX9 delivers excellent portability and ease for everyday snaps; the A99 is a long-term tool for high-quality, complex work.

Performance Scores and Genre-Specific Strengths


Summarizing my findings and referencing industry-standard benchmarks, the A99 scores close to 89 points in DxOMark’s overall sensor rating, with outstanding color depth and dynamic range.

The WX9 lacks official DxOMark testing but generally ranks low in sensor ratings due to limitations inherent in 1/2.3” sensors.

Looking at genres:

  • Portraits: A99’s eye detection, fast lenses, and skin tone rendering overpower WX9’s limited focal length and aperture.
  • Landscape: A99’s dynamic range and resolution excel; WX9 struggles to capture fine details and broad tonal variation.
  • Wildlife & Sports: A99’s fast AF, high continuous shooting, and lens choices make it effective; WX9’s contrast-detection AF and zoom are inadequate for fast action.
  • Street: WX9’s small size favors discretion and portability; A99 is more conspicuous and heavier.
  • Macro: A99 supports dedicated macro lenses and precise focusing; WX9 offers only a basic 5cm macro mode.
  • Night/Astro: A99 shines with high ISO and stabilisation; WX9 is limited to ISO 3200 with much noise.
  • Video: A99 provides superior audio and manual controls; WX9 covers only casual uses.
  • Travel: WX9 wins for size and simplicity; A99 offers versatility but at cost of weight.
  • Professional Use: A99’s robustness, workflow compatibility, and comprehensive controls make it suitable; WX9 is outmatched.

Final Thoughts: Which Sony Camera Fits Your Vision?

If you want an affordable, pocket-sized camera that delivers reasonably sharp photos for social sharing and travel memories, the Sony WX9 is a solid choice. Its lightweight portability, easy operation, and versatile zoom lens make it an ideal grab-and-go companion. For casual photographers or beginners who prioritize convenience and minimal setup, this camera offers good value.

On the flip side, the Sony A99 distinguishes itself as a professional-grade, full-frame powerhouse. Its superior sensor, flexible autofocus system, extensive lens ecosystem, and rugged build collectively provide the image quality and reliability required for serious portrait, landscape, sports, wildlife, and low-light photography. Though it commands a significant investment and warrants a learning curve, the A99 remains a remarkably capable tool even years after launch.

Here’s a quick reference summary to help align your needs:

Use Case Recommended Model Reasoning
Casual everyday shooting Sony WX9 Ultra-compact, simple, and affordable
Street photography Sony WX9 (for discretion) Small size, easy to carry
Travel photography Sony WX9 (light) / Sony A99 (versatile) Depends on priority: portability vs. quality
Portraits Sony A99 Superior sensor & lenses, face detection
Landscape Sony A99 Better resolution and dynamic range
Wildlife & Sports Sony A99 Fast AF, high fps, lens options
Low-light/Night Sony A99 High ISO performance, stabilization
Macro Sony A99 Dedicated macro lenses, articulated screen
Professional workflow Sony A99 RAW support, build, dual slots, tethering
Budget constraints Sony WX9 Inexpensive, easily accessible

In Closing

This head-to-head comparison underscores the intrinsic differences between an ultra-compact consumer camera and an advanced full-frame DSLR - a gap not bridged merely by brand or megapixels. Each occupies a precise niche.

From personal minutes spent under dawn light capturing landscapes to frantic bursts chasing sports action, I’ve been impressed by the A99’s balanced performance and rugged professional capability. Meanwhile, the WX9 shines when simplicity, portability, and instant use trump complexity.

Armed with this understanding, your next camera investment should align with your shooting ambitions and style.

Remember - the best camera is the one you actually use and enjoy.

Happy shooting!

Sony WX9 vs Sony A99 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Sony WX9 and Sony A99
 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9Sony SLT-A99
General Information
Brand Sony Sony
Model type Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX9 Sony SLT-A99
Category Ultracompact Advanced DSLR
Announced 2011-01-06 2012-12-12
Body design Ultracompact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by BIONZ Bionz
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.8 x 23.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 852.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 24MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 9 19
Cross type focus points - 11
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 25-125mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.6-6.3 -
Macro focusing range 5cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 921k dot 1,229k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology XtraFine LCD TFT Xtra Fine color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.71x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 2 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 10.0 frames per sec 10.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.30 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video data format MPEG-4, AVCHD MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight - 812 grams (1.79 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 56 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") 147 x 111 x 78mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 3.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 89
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 25.0
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 14.0
DXO Low light rating not tested 1555
Other
Battery life - 500 images
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-BN1 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo; SD, SDHC and SDXC
Storage slots One Dual
Cost at launch $188 $1,998