Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515

Portability
81
Imaging
62
Features
83
Overall
70
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Olympus VH-515 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Launched August 2020
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced August 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VH-515, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are created by Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizes.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 IV was revealed 8 years later than the VH-515 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the VH-515 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Olympus VH-515

 E-M10 IV VH-515 
AnnouncedAugust 2020August 2012More recent by 97 months
Manually focus More accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 VH-515 E-M10 IV 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VH-515

 E-M10 IV VH-515 
Display size3"3"Same display dimensions
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 IV has external dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VH-515 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the VH-515.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and VH-515 is 81 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by checking out specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and VH-515.

Plainly, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV having a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will show extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 IV provides an edge in sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 IV
Portrait photography with Olympus VH-515
77
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
27
comes with face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography details
Olympus VH-515 Street photography details
84
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
has touch to focus
good high ISO (25,600)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with touch focus
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Sports photography advice
Olympus VH-515 Sports photography advice
72
quiet shutter (1/16,000s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
has tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
32
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking autofocus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Travel photography features
Olympus VH-515 Travel photography features
84
has bluetooth
has touch to focus
MP count good (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
display is selfie friendly
62
comes with touch focus
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VH-515 Landscape photography highlights
82
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (20MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW formats
37
really wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Vlogging camera
Olympus VH-515 as a Vlogging camera
78
display is selfie friendly
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detect autofocus
video res high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
no mic jack
35
really wide (26mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Olympus VH-515
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVOlympus VH-515
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Olympus VH-515
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2020-08-04 2012-08-21
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 5184 x 3888 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.7 frames per second 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 4.70 m
Flash settings Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 152g (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $699 $648