Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26ee/b26ee354c3adaf0307bfc7498c215c4050aaeba0" alt="Pentax K110D front Pentax K110D front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Released August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Revealed May 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus E-M10 IV and Pentax K110D, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and K110D (6MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and K110D (APS-C) come with different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was introduced 14 years later than the K110D and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before going straight into a full comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M10 IV grades vs the K110D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Pentax K110D. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Pentax K110D
E-M10 IV | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2020 | ![]() | May 2006 | Fresher by 173 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 210k | Crisper screen (+830k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus E-M10 IV
K110D | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Pentax K110D
E-M10 IV | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera frequently, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with outer measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Pentax K110D has dimensions of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") having a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 IV and Pentax K110D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 IV against the K110D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3a408/3a40872b2569847f8822907917c4e912075f6375" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and K110D is 81 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/114b4/114b497acec23e8e7b4b489cfc0a9e68d3452a6a" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The visual below will provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and K110D.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M10 IV will resolve more detail using its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12efe/12efe84ab48ff8526b62c1e0019a3f7812ec0775" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae90f/ae90f780251ed7c5865335caa01eb9b14cd42254" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K110D |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2020-08-04 | 2006-05-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3008 x 2008 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW pictures | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.7 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | - |
Flash settings | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) | 585 grams (1.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/MMC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $699 | $1,000 |