Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
61 Imaging
49 Features
41 Overall
45
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Launched August 2020
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Introduced September 2008
- Replaced the Pentax K100D S
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Pentax. There exists a crucial gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and K200D (10MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) feature totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 IV was brought out 12 years after the K200D which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M10 IV scores against the K200D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV and Pentax K200D. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery and Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Pentax K200D
E-M10 IV | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2020 | September 2008 | Newer by 146 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-M10 IV
K200D | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Pentax K200D
E-M10 IV | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 IV features exterior measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has sizing of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Look at the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 IV versus the K200D.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 IV and K200D is 81 and 61 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through specs. The image below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 IV and K200D.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 IV featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will produce more detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Pentax K200D |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Launched | 2020-08-04 | 2008-09-01 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | 1/250 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | - |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 lbs) | 690 grams (1.52 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $699 | $600 |