Clicky

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225

Portability
81
Imaging
61
Features
83
Overall
69
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front
 
Samsung TL225 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
33
Overall
33

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
  • Revealed August 2020
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung TL225
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
  • Launched August 2009
  • Also Known as ST550
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Overview

Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung TL225, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a big difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and TL225 (12MP) and the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and TL225 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-M10 IV was revealed 11 years later than the TL225 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 IV scores versus the TL225 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Samsung TL225

 E-M10 IV TL225 
LaunchedAugust 2020August 2009Fresher by 134 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Olympus E-M10 IV

 TL225 E-M10 IV 
Screen size3.5"3"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1152k1040kClearer screen (+112k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung TL225

 E-M10 IV TL225 
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to carry your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV comes with outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) and the Samsung TL225 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung TL225 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV compared to the TL225.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and TL225 is 81 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by checking specs. The graphic below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 IV and TL225.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 IV having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 IV will give extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 IV should have an advantage in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Portrait photography camera
76
focusing manually
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
20
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
cannot use external flash
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Street photography info
Samsung TL225 Street photography info
84
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
boasts focus by touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
59
built in image stabilization (Optical)
comes with focus by touch
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
heavier than average in class (187g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Sports photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Sports photography camera
72
silent mode (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
27
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no shutter priority
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV as a Travel photography camera
Samsung TL225 as a Travel photography camera
84
has bluetooth
boasts focus by touch
MP count decent (20MP)
flash built-in
display is selfie friendly
59
comes with focus by touch
flash built-in
really wide (27mm)
missing Time Lapse function
heavier than average in class (187 grams)
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 IV Landscape photography advice
Samsung TL225 Landscape photography advice
82
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (20MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
36
really wide (27mm)
big screen (3.5")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 IV
Vlogging with Samsung TL225
77
display is selfie friendly
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pixels)
lack of external mic socket
29
really wide (27mm)
has touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Optical)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing external mic port
heavier than average in class (187 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 IV vs Samsung TL225 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 IV and Samsung TL225
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IVSamsung TL225
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV Samsung TL225
Also called - ST550
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2020-08-04 2009-08-13
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5184 x 3888 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-124mm (4.6x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.9
Macro focus range - 5cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3.5"
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 1,152k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 8.7 frames per second -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.20 m (at ISO 200) 3.40 m
Flash modes Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps)
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 383g (0.84 pounds) 187g (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 360 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 SLB-07A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $699 $488