Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500
81 Imaging
62 Features
83 Overall
70
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cc02/3cc02b21bcc1b0f5d096d59208c0f114056c9ece" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a85a/9a85a4749dcb02d0cfee7a599953a613ec63c5b3" alt="Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 front"
91 Imaging
43 Features
56 Overall
48
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 383g - 122 x 84 x 49mm
- Revealed August 2020
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-720mm (F3.5-6.4) lens
- 236g - 102 x 58 x 36mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Superseded the Sony WX350
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 IV (20MP) and the WX500 (18MP) is relatively similar but the E-M10 IV (Four Thirds) and WX500 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 IV was released 5 years later than the WX500 and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 IV being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony WX500 being a Compact camera.
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the E-M10 IV matches up vs the WX500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 IV Gallery & Sony WX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 IV over the Sony WX500
E-M10 IV | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2020 | ![]() | April 2015 | More recent by 65 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Sharper screen (+119k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony WX500 over the Olympus E-M10 IV
WX500 | E-M10 IV |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 IV and Sony WX500
E-M10 IV | WX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 IV enjoys exterior dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 383 grams (0.84 lbs) whilst the Sony WX500 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") having a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 IV vs the WX500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8f343/8f343f207cf781894cd5043d6a3c8a4212236e99" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 IV and WX500 is 81 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44126/441266402536c560c858c6a1be5689b51a44552c" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 IV and WX500.
Clearly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 IV featuring a bigger sensor will make getting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 IV will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 IV will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b18d5/b18d519f4bd0206d8a5e1148b4895759140ac0a2" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e96a8/e96a8da8d5c92c6ff3f5c10a9f6743685ff32b3e" alt="Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 IV vs Sony WX500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 IV | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2020-08-04 | 2015-04-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4896 x 3672 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-720mm (30.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.7 frames per sec | 10.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m (at ISO 200) | 5.40 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Redeye, fill-in, off, redeye slow-sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (1st-curtain), slow sync (2nd-curtain), manual | Auto, flash on, slow sync, flash off, rear sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 52 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, XAVC S |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 383 grams (0.84 pounds) | 236 grams (0.52 pounds) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 49mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 58 x 36mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | 360 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $699 | $348 |