Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus SP-620 UZ front
Portability
78
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Launched August 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus SP-620 UZ
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
  • 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
  • Launched January 2012
  • Older Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview

Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-620 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SP-620 UZ (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 III was released 5 years later than the SP-620 UZ and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-M10 III SP-620 UZ 
LaunchedAugust 2017January 2012Fresher by 69 months
Manual focus More precise focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k230kSharper display (+810k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 III

 SP-620 UZ E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-620 UZ

 E-M10 III SP-620 UZ 
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SP-620 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-620 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the SP-620 UZ.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and SP-620 UZ is 80 and 78 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SP-620 UZ.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III comes with the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The newer E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography details
Olympus SP-620 UZ Portrait photography details
73
focusing manually
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features face detect focus
supports RAW files
34
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
features face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Olympus SP-620 UZ as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
boasts touch to focus
great ISO range (25,600)
heavier than others in class (410g)
50
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Sports photography camera
Olympus SP-620 UZ as a Sports photography camera
69
quiet shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
features tracking focus
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
48
great zoom range (25-525mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Olympus SP-620 UZ
67
boasts touch to focus
MP count good (16MP)
flash built-in
heavier than others in class (410g)
does not have a selfie friendly display
61
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (25mm)
great reach (525mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Landscape photography factors
Olympus SP-620 UZ Landscape photography factors
80
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW files
41
rather wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging features
Olympus SP-620 UZ Vlogging features
32
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detect focus
high video quality (3840 x 2160 pxls)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have mic support
heavier than others in class (410 grams)
28
rather wide (25mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-620 UZ
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus SP-620 UZ
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus SP-620 UZ
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2017-08-31 2012-01-10
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VIII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 121 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-525mm (21.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.1-5.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/1500s
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000s -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 6.00 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250s -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410 grams (0.90 pounds) 435 grams (0.96 pounds)
Physical dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 4 x AA
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots 1 1
Launch cost $650 $199