Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5e15b/5e15bbd13d20cd8ec38f10fc405eeba9ee72db5a" alt="Olympus SP-620 UZ front Olympus SP-620 UZ front"
78 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Launched August 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-525mm (F3.1-5.8) lens
- 435g - 110 x 74 x 74mm
- Launched January 2012
- Older Model is Olympus SP-610UZ
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-620 UZ, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both of them are designed by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the SP-620 UZ (16MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and SP-620 UZ (1/2.3") posses different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 III was released 5 years later than the SP-620 UZ and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus SP-620 UZ being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the E-M10 III matches up vs the SP-620 UZ for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus SP-620 UZ. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus SP-620 UZ Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M10 III | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 69 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus SP-620 UZ over the Olympus E-M10 III
SP-620 UZ | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus SP-620 UZ
E-M10 III | SP-620 UZ | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 III offers outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") and a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) while the Olympus SP-620 UZ has measurements of 110mm x 74mm x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus SP-620 UZ in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 III versus the SP-620 UZ.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4ffc/b4ffc57ea8466b1cbd1f66d66aa32f6d305d90e0" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 III and SP-620 UZ is 80 and 78 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1eed3/1eed35bff44e85e4ac56945a5395b1730424b658" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The visual below may offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and SP-620 UZ.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have the same megapixels but different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III comes with the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The newer E-M10 III should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59afa/59afac0602444b3a25b8ab0594647430d1b867ee" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/17740/17740f238557261e7cc98b498e187813609f7577" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus SP-620 UZ Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-620 UZ | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus SP-620 UZ |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2017-08-31 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-525mm (21.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.1-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.6 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | 6.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 grams (0.90 pounds) | 435 grams (0.96 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 74 x 74mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $650 | $199 |