Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d1f7/1d1f7c5299d6dfb035dfb03d930a972a1e62108f" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90636/906367f78182e973de499b537fdc76fa3fafdc16" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS front"
91 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 218g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Overview
Here is a in depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-850 iHS, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TG-850 iHS (16MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-850 iHS (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M10 III was revealed 3 years later than the TG-850 iHS and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-850 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M10 III grades versus the TG-850 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery & Olympus TG-850 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | ![]() | January 2014 | Fresher by 44 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-850 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III
TG-850 iHS | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-850 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-850 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with outside dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-850 iHS has proportions of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-850 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III and the TG-850 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fccc2/fccc28623c2a9f9c31b3e9c431220ec576ad3fda" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TG-850 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dd0e/6dd0e08b5f26f767ae932987834d4d0b4405c27d" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing merely by reading through specifications. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 III and TG-850 iHS.
To sum up, both of the cameras provide the same megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The E-M10 III includes the larger sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF simpler. The fresher E-M10 III will have an advantage in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fd8c3/fd8c3c5478dce410930fc15039787682f6d19812" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/203ae/203aef3acc5ee6ae4ef5e207a8c4f1c58afdf17f" alt="Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-850 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-850 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2014-01-29 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4616 x 3464 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.7 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 1/2s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.6 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Yes |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 pictures | 330 pictures |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 sec, 12 sec, Custom Self-Timer (1-30 sec start timer, 1-10 pictures, 1-3 sec interval)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $650 | $250 |