Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860 front
Portability
91
Imaging
41
Features
42
Overall
41

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Announced August 2017
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10 II
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus TG-860
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
  • 224g - 110 x 64 x 28mm
  • Announced February 2015
  • Renewed by Olympus TG-870
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Overview

Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-860, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are created by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 III (16MP) and the TG-860 (16MP) is very comparable but the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-860 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor size.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M10 III was announced 2 years later than the TG-860 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-860 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 III scores vs the TG-860 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-860

 E-M10 III TG-860 
AnnouncedAugust 2017February 2015Fresher by 32 months
Manually focus Very precise focus
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-860 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 TG-860 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-860

 E-M10 III TG-860 
Display typeTiltingTiltingTilting display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display size
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III comes with external measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus TG-860 has specifications of 110mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1") with a weight of 224 grams (0.49 lbs).

Look at the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-860 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 III and the TG-860.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and TG-860 is 80 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic here might offer you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and TG-860.

As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy the same exact MP but not the same sensor sizing. The E-M10 III features the larger sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler. The more recent E-M10 III is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-860
73
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
36
megapixel count decent (16MP)
offers face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-860 as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
more heavy than others (410 grams)
69
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Optical)
weather proofing
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography features
Olympus TG-860 Sports photography features
69
quiet shutter (1/16,000 seconds)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
no phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
weather proofing
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Travel photography details
Olympus TG-860 Travel photography details
67
supports touch to focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
more heavy than others (410 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
71
weather proofing
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
pretty wide (21mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-860
80
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
48
pretty wide (21mm)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
weather proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging info
Olympus TG-860 Vlogging info
32
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have external microphone socket
more heavy than others (410g)
33
pretty wide (21mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic socket
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-860 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-860
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus Stylus Tough TG-860
General Information
Company Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus Stylus Tough TG-860
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Announced 2017-08-31 2015-02-06
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII TruePic VII
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 125
RAW photos
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 121 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 21-105mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/3.5-5.7
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Tilting
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Highest silent shutter speed 1/16000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.6 frames/s 7.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (at ISO 100) 4.00 m (at ISO 1600)
Flash settings Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 1920x1080
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Yes
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 410 grams (0.90 lb) 224 grams (0.49 lb)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 110 x 64 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 shots 300 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 Li-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $650 $279