Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and they are both designed by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 III was unveiled 5 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the E-M10 III matches up against the TG-1 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | May 2012 | Newer by 65 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 III
TG-1 iHS | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M10 III | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera, you will want to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 III features outer dimensions of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) and the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 III vs the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 III and TG-1 iHS is 80 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking specifications. The image here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 III and TG-1 iHS.
Plainly, the two cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 III with its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will give more detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 III will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VIII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 121 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/16000s | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.6fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410 gr (0.90 lbs) | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photos | 350 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $650 | $399 |