Clicky

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5

Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
 
Olympus Tough TG-5 front
Portability
90
Imaging
38
Features
51
Overall
43

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Introduced August 2017
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
  • Released May 2017
  • Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
  • Later Model is Olympus TG-6
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Overview

Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The E-M10 III was released 4 months later than the TG-5 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 III scores versus the TG-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-5

 E-M10 III TG-5 
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k460kCrisper display (+580k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 TG-5 E-M10 III 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-5

 E-M10 III TG-5 
ReleasedAugust 2017May 2017Same generation
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III against the TG-5.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TG-5 is 80 and 90 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and TG-5.

Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-5
73
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW files
39
focusing manually
provides face detect focus
supports RAW formats
no manual control
external flash not possible
MP count low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Street photography camera
77
screen tilts
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
offers focus via touch
good ISO range (25,600)
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
64
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
no moving screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
heavier than average in class (250 grams)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Sports photography info
Olympus TG-5 Sports photography info
69
silent shooting (1/16,000 seconds)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
46
fast continuous shooting (20.0 frames per second)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking focus
environment proof
great battery pack (340 per charge)
no shutter priority
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
Travel photography with Olympus TG-5
67
offers focus via touch
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
heavier than competitors (410 grams)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
68
great battery pack (340 per charge)
environment proof
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
heavier than average in class (250g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-5 as a Landscape photography camera
80
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
57
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW formats
environment proof
great battery pack (340 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
MP count low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging details
Olympus TG-5 Vlogging details
32
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
missing external mic jack
heavier than competitors (410g)
34
relatively wide (25mm)
great maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detect focus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic support
heavier than average in class (250g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-5
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark IIIOlympus Tough TG-5
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III Olympus Tough TG-5
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2017-08-31 2017-05-17
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VIII TruePic VIII
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.4 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 226.2mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 12800
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 121 25
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dots 460 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Max quiet shutter speed 1/16000 seconds -
Continuous shutter rate 8.6 frames per second 20.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/250 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 3840x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 410g (0.90 lbs) 250g (0.55 lbs)
Dimensions 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 330 photographs 340 photographs
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-92B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible)
Card slots Single Single
Retail cost $650 $449