Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Released May 2017
- Succeeded the Olympus TG-4
- Later Model is Olympus TG-6
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are produced by Olympus. There is a significant difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 III (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M10 III (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 III was released 4 months later than the TG-5 so they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 III scores versus the TG-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III and Olympus Tough TG-5. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 III Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Olympus TG-5
E-M10 III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M10 III
TG-5 | E-M10 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 III and Olympus TG-5
E-M10 III | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2017 | May 2017 | Same generation | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera regularly, you have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 III has physical measurements of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-5 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 III versus Olympus TG-5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 III against the TG-5.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 III and TG-5 is 80 and 90 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 III and TG-5.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 III due to its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 III will result in more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 III vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2017-08-31 | 2017-05-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VIII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 226.2mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 121 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.6 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 410g (0.90 lbs) | 250g (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 photographs | 340 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $650 | $449 |